EdSights Risk Category

From CSUMB Data Glossary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

EdSights Risk Category represents four different dimensions of potential risk--academic, engagement, financial, wellness--and an overall risk across all of the domains. These categories are determined based on text conversations between students and the AI chatbot (Monte) where these conversations mention risk factors pertaining to theses domains.[1][2]

Metadata
Data Custodian
Institutional Assessment and Research
Data Source
Source System:EdSights
Source Table Name:Risk
Source Field Name:N/A
Census Process:N/A
Logical Transformation / Calculation
N/A
Dataset Folder and Field Name
Dataset Folder:Edsights Risk
Field Name:EdSights Risk Category


EdSights Risk Categories

Financial Distress

Example risk factors: balancing work and school, food insecurity.

Academic Engagement

Example risk factors: Course engagement, self-efficacy.

Wellness

Example risk factors: Emotional wellbeing, lifestyle.

Engagement

Example risk factors: Belonging, Support System.

Overall

Includes all of the above risk domains aggregated together. 

Business Rules

EdSights is an AI chatbot (Monte) that engages our undergraduate students through supportive, personalized text message conversations with campaigns every ~2 weeks.

Examples

  • Overall Risk
  • Academic Risk
  • Engagement Risk
  • Financial Risk
  • Wellness Risk

See Also

Definition Source

"At EdSights, we utilize a research-backed Messaging Framework to measure student risk for persistence by monitoring key drivers that influence a student’s likelihood to remain enrolled and complete their degree. These Risk Drivers are designed to surface indicators that often precede disengagement or withdrawal. Each driver is broken down into targeted subgroups that explore different dimensions of the student experience - from how socially connected students feel on campus, to how confident they are in their ability to succeed, to how satisfied they are with their institution. By proactively tracking these student perceptions, institutions can identify at-risk students earlier and deliver timely, personalized interventions."[2]

"Drawing on decades of persistence research, we’ve developed a unique approach that combines AI with text messaging to engage students more effectively and uncover their needs. Grounded in Dr. Vincent Tinto’s research, our communication framework assesses student perceptions through four key lenses:

Financial Distress

Example risk factors: balancing work and school, food insecurity

Academic Engagement

Example risk factors: Course engagement, self-efficacy

Wellness

Example risk factors: Emotional wellbeing, lifestyle

Engagement

Example risk factors: Belonging, Support System"[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 EdSights. EdSights Retain.
  2. 2.0 2.1 EdSights. EdSights Framework Glossary.